About accessibility
Genesys is committed to a more inclusive customer experience and continuously works to enhance accessibility in Genesys Cloud. Accessibility design and implementation includes support for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and other features, based on inclusive user interface design.
Genesys has focused its efforts on following the standards set forth in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) 2.2 Level AA, Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act (corrected January 22, 2018), and EN 301 549 (V3.1.1 & V3.2.1) and shall make every reasonable effort to conform with such standards.
Genesys Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACRs) which document our conformance to these requirements are available in the following section.
For Genesys Cloud services offered in France, Genesys also evaluates accessibility against the French General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA).
Genesys Cloud Services – RGAA Accessibility Statement
Genesys Cloud Services, B.V. shall make every reasonable effort to conform with such accessibility standards in accordance with Article 47 of French Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.
This accessibility statement applies to the Genesys Cloud web application.
The Genesys corporate website is available at https://www.genesys.com/. The corporate website itself was not included within the scope of this RGAA audit.
State of conformity
Genesys Cloud is partially compliant with the French General Accessibility Improvement Framework, RGAA version 4.1.1.
Test results
The external compliance audit conducted by Lighthouse Works in March 2026 found that:
- 28 criteria were met
- 18 criteria were not met
- 60 criteria were not applicable
This means that 60.87% of the applicable RGAA criteria were met.
Content not accessible
Non-conformities
- Some informative images do not have an appropriate text alternative.
- Some decorative images may be unnecessarily announced by screen readers.
- Some frames or iframes do not have a sufficiently descriptive title.
- Some information is communicated using color alone.
- Some text and interface components have insufficient contrast against their background.
- Some table row or column headers are not correctly associated with their data cells.
- Some tables do not communicate their structure correctly to assistive technologies.
- Some links do not have a sufficiently clear or meaningful accessible name.
- Some scripts and interactive components are not fully compatible with screen readers.
- Some scripts and interactive components cannot be fully operated using a keyboard.
- Some expanded, collapsed, selected, or updated states are not correctly communicated to assistive technologies.
- Some changes of context are not announced or cannot be controlled by the user.
- Some status messages and dynamically updated content are not correctly communicated to screen readers.
- Some pages or interface regions do not use an appropriate heading structure.
- Some page regions are not identified using appropriate landmarks.
- Some lists are not marked up as lists.
- Some information or functionality may be lost when CSS is disabled.
- Some text or interface content may become difficult to read when text is resized to 200%.
- The keyboard focus indicator is not visible on some interactive elements.
- Some hidden content is unnecessarily exposed to screen readers or keyboard users.
- Some content may be obscured or require horizontal scrolling when the viewport width is reduced.
- Changes to text spacing may obscure content or affect functionality.
- Some form fields do not have an accessible label.
- Some form fields have labels that are unclear or do not adequately describe their purpose.
- Some related form fields are not grouped programmatically.
- Some form buttons do not have a sufficiently meaningful accessible name.
- Some form fields do not correctly identify or communicate input errors.
- Some required fields or input requirements are not clearly communicated.
- Some application regions are not identified programmatically.
- On some screens, the keyboard navigation order is not logical or predictable.
- Focus may not always move to the expected location when a panel or dialog opens or closes.
- Some content displayed on hover or focus is not fully available to keyboard or screen-reader users.
- Some data visualizations require mouse interaction and do not provide an equivalent keyboard-accessible alternative.
The principal RGAA criteria affected are:
- Images: 1.1 and 1.2
- Frames: 2.1
- Color and contrast: 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
- Tables: 5.3, 5.6, and 5.8
- Links: 6.1 and 6.2
- Scripts and dynamic content: 7.1, 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5
- Information structure: 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3
- Presentation and reflow: 10.7, 10.10, 10.11, and 10.13
- Forms: 11.1, 11.2, 11.5, 11.7, 11.9, 11.10, 11.11, and 11.13
- Navigation: 12.6, 12.8, and 12.9
Disproportionate-burden exemptions
Genesys Cloud does not claim any exemptions based on disproportionate burden.
Content not subject to accessibility requirements
No content has been identified as excluded from the accessibility requirements within the declared audit scope.
Establishment of this accessibility statement
This statement was established on August 4, 2026.
The external audit supporting this statement was conducted by Lighthouse Works in March 2026.
Technologies used to create the application
- HTML5
- CSS
- JavaScript
- WAI-ARIA
- SVG
- Web components
Test environment
Content-rendering and accessibility checks were performed using the environments documented in the supporting Accessibility Conformance Report, including:
- Windows 11 with Google Chrome
- Windows 11 with Microsoft Edge
- Windows 11 with Mozilla Firefox
- NVDA
- JAWS
- Windows Magnifier
- ZoomText
- Keyboard-only navigation
Tools and methods used to assess accessibility
- axe DevTools
- Automated accessibility testing using axe
- Manual keyboard testing
- Manual testing with NVDA
- Manual testing with JAWS
- Testing with and without assistive technologies
- Browser developer tools
- Contrast and grayscale checks
- Manual review of headings, landmarks, forms, tables, links, and dynamic components
Screens that underwent compliance verification
- Activity: Overview
- Activity: Insights
- Activity: Scorecard
- Activity: Leaderboard
- Activity: Schedule
- Help
- Calls
- Chats
- Inbox
- User Panel
- Preferences
- Call Controls
- Workspace: Agent Workspace
- Workspace: Parked Conversations
- Document Dashboard
- Performance Management: Real-time Adherence
- Performance Management: Intraday Monitoring
- Performance Management: Historical Adherence
- Performance Management: Historical Shrinkage
- Performance Management: Development Feedback
- Development and Feedback: New Module
- Performance Management: External Metric
- Performance Management: Gamification Settings
Feedback and contact
When a user is unable to access content or use a feature of Genesys Cloud, they can contact Genesys to request assistance, an accessible alternative, or the content in another format.
accessibilityfeedback@genesys.com
Please include “Accessibility Feedback” in the subject line.
Telephone
Postal address
Genesys Accessibility Feedback
Attn: Accessibility Manager
Mr Treublaan 7
1097 DP Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Genesys will acknowledge feedback submissions requesting a response within one week, or five business days.
Information may also be requested in another accessible format, including large print, Braille, audio, or an electronic format compatible with assistive technology.
Legal remedies
This procedure may be used when an accessibility issue prevents a user from accessing Genesys Cloud content or functionality, the issue has been reported to Genesys, and no satisfactory response or solution has been provided.
Several options are available:
- Write to the French Defender of Rights using its online contact form.
- Contact a local representative of the Defender of Rights.
- Send a letter free of charge and without postage to:
Défenseur des droits
Libre réponse 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07
France
Genesys Cloud accessibility compliance
Accessibility compliance is evaluated through manual and automated testing. Manual evaluation methods include use of screen readers such as VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Apart from automated tools, automated testing incorporates browser plugins such as axe and accessibility insights.
[NEXT] Was this article helpful?
Get user feedback about articles.